<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logical Fallacies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/</link>
	<description>Noise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:14:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsh</title>
		<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-27294</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psyriac.com/?p=1015#comment-27294</guid>
		<description>I think he has a point on a lot of things- religious people should think about what they believe and why they believe it.  I particularly think he made a good point about some televangelists.  However, it would be a hasty generalization to say that all televangelists are necessarily like him.  I prefer to think that everything is really more complicated than it appears- meaning that individuals and circumstances can vary.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he has a point on a lot of things- religious people should think about what they believe and why they believe it.  I particularly think he made a good point about some televangelists.  However, it would be a hasty generalization to say that all televangelists are necessarily like him.  I prefer to think that everything is really more complicated than it appears- meaning that individuals and circumstances can vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prestidigitator</title>
		<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-20970</link>
		<dc:creator>prestidigitator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psyriac.com/?p=1015#comment-20970</guid>
		<description>I do listen to skeptoid. Will check out dbskeptic. Thanks! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do listen to skeptoid. Will check out dbskeptic. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhel</title>
		<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-20481</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psyriac.com/?p=1015#comment-20481</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link - if you haven&#039;t already, check out dbskeptic.com and skeptoid.com  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link &#8211; if you haven&#8217;t already, check out dbskeptic.com and skeptoid.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prestidigitator</title>
		<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-20367</link>
		<dc:creator>prestidigitator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psyriac.com/?p=1015#comment-20367</guid>
		<description>Oh no, I do know that Maher exploits his opponents&#039; logical fallacies.  
 
What I can&#039;t reconcile is the self proclaimed *skeptic Maher* and the *alternative medicine/quackery subscribing Maher*. You really start to wonder what his line of reasoning would have been for him to embrace atheism (antitheism or apatheism even). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, I do know that Maher exploits his opponents&#039; logical fallacies.  </p>
<p>What I can&#039;t reconcile is the self proclaimed *skeptic Maher* and the *alternative medicine/quackery subscribing Maher*. You really start to wonder what his line of reasoning would have been for him to embrace atheism (antitheism or apatheism even).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://psyriac.com/2009/10/05/logical-fallacies/comment-page-1/#comment-20360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psyriac.com/?p=1015#comment-20360</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve seen of Bill Maher, I&#039;d say he exploits these fallacies rather than employing them himself. Have you seen Religulous? In that, most of the arguments for religion are sort of the ad ignorantiam menioned above. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen of Bill Maher, I&#8217;d say he exploits these fallacies rather than employing them himself. Have you seen Religulous? In that, most of the arguments for religion are sort of the ad ignorantiam menioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

